-
让品牌有温度、有情感
专注品牌策划15年
论文投稿的justification（论文投稿的title怎么填）
发布时间：2023-06-14 11:05:25
稿源：
创意岭 阅读：
139
大家好！今天让创意岭的小编来大家介绍下关于论文投稿的justification的问题，以下是小编对此问题的归纳整理，让我们一起来看看吧。
开始之前先推荐一个非常厉害的Ai人工智能工具，一键生成原创文章、方案、文案、工作计划、工作报告、论文、代码、作文、做题和对话答疑等等
只需要输入关键词，就能返回你想要的内容，有小程序、在线网页版、PC客户端和批量生成器
本文目录:
等待作者批准转换文件
论文投稿后送审时间要看杂志社的收稿情况，论文投稿后要先等杂志社编辑审稿，如果杂志社收稿量比较大，等的时间也会长一些，收稿量小的话，时间也会短一些，当然不同出版社期刊的投稿方式，过程及状态都是有所区别的，但基本形式大致相同，下面杂志投稿网小编就对此进行介绍，广大投稿者可以作为参考：1. 等待作者批准的提交
在投稿系统里，将稿件以及相关信息上传填写完毕后，状态显示等待作者提交，然后点击提交，之后是批准提交，文章进入杂志编辑评估阶段。该阶段主要有两类杂志编辑对论文进行评估，一类是技术编辑负责质控论文的格式，一类是学术编辑负责把关论文与杂志主题是否符合，论文质量如何，是否值得送外审，以及也负责将审稿回来的建议上交给总编辑并进行决策文章录用与否。
2.您的论文就是在等待审核状态
技术编辑对论文格式进行审阅，如果格式不对或者缺少必要的内容等，则会将论文打回修改。这个过程也不会很长，一般几天左右能够完成。收到退回修改的邮件和消息后，就需要作者根据编辑要求对论文进行格式修改，再次提交即可。
3.然后就是您的论文在审核中
如果杂志编辑认为投稿论文格式符合要求，学术编辑认为投稿论文主题符合杂志，对论文感兴趣，值得外送，这个时候，稿件的状态会变更为等待审核，那么意味着文章已经推送到了同行评审哪里，这个时间也不是统一的。
当然具体您的论文投稿后什么时候能送审，不同杂志的审稿周期差异比较大，从几天到数月不等，甚至也有好几年的。对于大部分学术期刊而言，从投稿到接收(或拒稿)大概在数月内(2-6个月)可以完成，作者能做的就是提早准备自己的论文，以免耽误评职，更多详情可以咨询杂志投稿网的在线老师
tie论文送审几个状态
13个状态。1、ManuscriptSubmitted（Submittedtojournal）：表示论文已经投稿成功。接下来由期刊工作人员检查论文格式排版、重复率是否符合要求，符合要求的文章会分配给期刊编辑进行处理。
2、Awaitingadminprocessing：意为等待负责的编辑处理。在编辑审稿前，助手负责审查稿件是否齐全，不齐全的话则立即要求作者按要求补充相关材料。许多期刊会在系统显示ManuscriptSubmitted时完成该步骤。
3、EditorInvited：这个阶段不是所有的期刊都有，这个状态是表示论文已经转给编辑，正在等待编辑接受。
4、WithEditor：这个状态表示编辑已经接受负责处理论文，这个时候，编辑已经初步看过论文，如果他认为论文适合期刊，就会送交同行评审；如果论文与期刊的范畴不相符或是没有达到期刊的标准，就有可能在外审前退回给作者，这种时候，状态就有可能变成「DecisioninProcess」。在这种情况下，作者都会在几天之内收到拒绝通知。在这一过程中还可能会出现「Editorassigned」，表示稿件已经分配给某位主编或副主编负责。
此外，还有可能会出现「EditorDeclinedInvitation」，表示该编辑拒绝邀请，此时编辑会重新分派给其他编辑处理。
5、ReviewerInvited：编辑已经送出审稿邀请，等待审稿人接受中。有时候，这个状态可能会维持好一段时间后又变回「WithEditor」，这有可能是审稿人拒绝审稿，编辑需要再另外找审稿人。
6、UnderReview（Peerreview）：审稿人正在审稿。此时论文是由同行评审进行外审，因为审稿是无偿的工作加上需要付出许多精力，这个过程需要持续较长时间，一般为1-2个月。如果被邀请审稿人取消审稿，就会decline，编辑会重新邀请别的审稿人。
同行评审是SCI论文审稿中耗时最久，也是影响杂志社决定最关键的环节。
7、RequiredReviewsComplete：表示审稿意见已经返回给编辑，等编辑处理。有时候，编辑在看完审稿报告后可能会觉得需要邀请其他审稿人进行审稿。此时，系统的状态就有可能再度变成「UnderReview」。
8、DecisioninProcess：表示编辑正在根据审稿意见文章进行决策。必要的时候，编辑会在此阶段与编辑部的其他成员商讨，一旦出现这个状态，作者一般会在几天之内收到通知。
9、Reject：审稿人看过内容或者审稿意见后作出的决定，表示拒绝这篇论文。这种是最常见的状态，著名杂志拒稿率可达90%。
10、Majorrevision：需要进行大量修改，不一定意味着接受。提示审稿人评价较好，有机会被接受。一定要认真、严格按照意见修改，审稿人稍不满意稿件也会被拒绝。现在因为「论文工厂」以及学术造假等事件，退稿比例越来越高。
11、Minorrevision：需要进行少量修改，原则上确定接受稿件，仍需虚心接受审稿人的意见，进行一对一的修改。
12、RevisedManuscriptSubmitted：意味着作者已经递交修改稿，现等待期刊检查排版。
13、Accept：意味着编辑对作者的修改很满意，决定接受稿件。
sci 投稿 怎么使用the journal template
SCI投稿信件模板
一、投稿信
1. Dear Dr. XXX
I
am
sending
a
manuscript
entitled
“
XXXX
”
by
XXXX,
which
I
should
like
to
submit
for
possible publication in the journal of XXXX.
Yours sincerely
2. Dear Dr. XXX
Enclosed is a manuscript entitled “
XXX
” by
XXX, which we are submitting for publication in
the journal of XXX. We have chosen this journal because it deals with XXX. We believe that sth
would be of interest to the journal’s readers.
3. Dear Dr. XXX
Please find enclosed for your review an original research article, “
XXX
” by sb. All authors
have read and approve this version of the article, and due care has been taken to ensure the
integrity of the work. No part of this paper has published or submitted elsewhere. No conflict of
interest exits in the submission of this manuscript, and we have attached to this letter the signed
letter granting us permission to use Figure 1 from another source.
We
appreciate
your
consideration
of
our
manuscript,
and
we
look
forward
to
receiving
comments from the reviewers.
二、询问有无收到稿件
Dear Editor,
We dispatched our manuscript to your journal on 3 August 2006 but have not, as yet, receive
acknowledgement of their safe arrival. We fear that may have been lost and should be grateful if
you
would
let
us
know
whether
or
not
you
have
received
them.
If
not,
we
will
send
our
manuscript again. Thank you in advance for your help.
三、询问论文审查回音
Dear Editor,
It is more than 12 weeks since I submitted our manuscript (No: ) for possible publication in
your journal. I have not yet received a reply and am wondering whether you have reached a
decision. I should appreciate your letting me know what you have decided as soon as possible.
四、关于论文的总体审查意见
1.
This
is
a
carefully
done
study
and
the
findings
are
of
considerable
interest.
A
few
minor
revision are list below.
2.
This
is
a
well-written
paper
containing
interesting
results
which
merit
publication.
For
the
benefit
of
the
reader,
however,
a
number
of
points
need
clarifying
and
certain
statements
require further justification. There are given below.
3. Although these observation are interesting, they are rather limited and do not advance our
knowledge
of
the
subject
sufficiently
to
warrant
publication
in
PNAS.
We
suggest
that
the
authors try submitting their findings to specialist journal such as XXX.
4. Although this paper is good, it would be ever better if some extra data were added.
5.
This
manuscript
is
not
suitable
for
publication
in
the
journal
of
–
because
the
main
observation it describe was reported 3 years ago in a reputable journal of XXX.
6. Please ask someone familiar with English language to help you rewrite this paper. As you will
see,
I
have
made
some
correction
at
the
beginning
of
the
paper
where
some
syntax
is
not
satisfactory.
7. We feel that this potentially interesting study has been marred by an inability to communicate
the finding correctly in English and should like to suggest that the authors seek the advice of
someone with a good knowledge of English, preferable native speaker.
8. The
wording
and
style of some section, particularly those
concerning
HPLC, need careful
editing.
Attention
should
be
paid
to
the
wording
of
those
parts
of
the
Discussion
of
and
Summary which have been underlined.
9.
Preliminary
experiments
only
have
been
done
and
with
exception
of
that
summarized
in
Table 2, none has been repeated. This is clearly unsatisfactory, particularly when there is so
much variation between assays.
10.
The
condition
of incubation
are
poorly
defined. What
is
the
temperature? Were
antibody
used?
五、给编辑的回信
1. In reply to the
referee’s main criticism of paper, it is possible to say that
XXX
One minor point raised by the referee concerns of the extra composition of the reaction mixture
in Figure 1. This has now been corrected. Further minor changes had been made on page 3,
paragraph 1 (line 3-8) and 2 (line 6-11). These do not affect our interpretation of the result.
2.
I
have
read
the
referee’s
comments
very
carefully
and
conclude
that
the
paper
has
been
rejected on the sole grounds that it lake toxicity data. I admit that I did not include a toxicity table
in my article although perhaps I should have done. This was for the sake of brevity rather than
an error or omission.
3. Thank you for your letter of XXX
and for the referee’s comments concerning our manuscript
entitled “
XXX
”. We hav
e studied their comments carefully and have made correction which we
hope meet with their approval.
4. I enclosed a revised manuscript which includes a report of additional experiments done at the
referee’s suggestion. You will see that our original findin
gs are confirmed.
5. We are sending the revised manuscript according to the comments of the reviewers. Revised
portion are underlined in red.
6. We found the referee’s comments most helpful
and have revised the manuscript.
7. We are pleased to note the favorable comments of reviewers in their opening sentence.
8. Thank you for your letter. I am very pleased to learn that our manuscript is acceptable for
publication in Cancer Research with minor revision.
9.
We
have
therefore
completed
a
further
series
of
experiments,
the
result
of
which
are
summarized in Table 5. From this we conclude that intrinsic factor is not account.
10. We deleted the relevant passage since they are not essential to the contents of the paper.
11.
I
feel
that
the
reviewer’s
comments
co
ncerning
Figures
1
and
2
results
from
a
misinterpretation of the data.
12. We would have included a non-protein inhibitor in our system, as a control, if one had been
available.
13. We
prefer
to
retain
the
use
of
Table
4
for
reasons
that
it
should
be
clear
from
the
new
paragraph inserted at the end of the Results section.
JMC投稿 cover letter 怎么传
有两种方式，你选一种：1、不用coverletter的。直接把你文章具有的意义上传就好。投稿的时候里面有个选项“justification”
2、cover letter和你的文章一起传就好了，就用comment to editor上传，如果没有这个选项，可以放在manuscript的第一页！
以上就是关于论文投稿的justification相关问题的回答。希望能帮到你，如有更多相关问题，您也可以联系我们的客服进行咨询，客服也会为您讲解更多精彩的知识和内容。
推荐阅读：
赣公网安备 50019002502384号
